Aims. This study explores the lived experience of "micro-cheating" in Russian couples and analyzes the impact of digital footprints on marital stability, focusing on behaviors perceived as fidelity violations.
Methods. A qualitative phenomenological study was conducted with 50 couples (N=100) undergoing therapy for trust crises. Data from interviews were analyzed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
Results. Three clinical types of digital infidelity were identified: "Ambiguous interaction," "Digital flirting," and "Dating curiosity." The study reveals a correlation between a partner's digital footprint and PISD-like symptoms (Post-Infidelity Stress Disorder) in the injured party.
Conclusions. In cultures valuing strict exclusivity, digital ambiguity triggers significant conflict. The findings recommend implementing "digital contracting" in therapy to define boundaries and prevent relationship breakdown.